mkfit for LST-seeded in offline phase-2#51140
Conversation
…te cleaning, passThrough for all tracks disabled
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51140/49660
|
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_20_1_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_20_0_X. |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals Failed RelValsValueError: Undefined workflows: 29634.7571 |
|
test parameters:
|
|
please test |
|
Workflows 34434.757,34434.702 are the closest ones using MkFit in 20_1_X to my knowledge |
|
please abort |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
PR description:
This PR enables via the procModifiers combination
trackingMkFitHighPtTripletStep & seedingLST & trackingLSTthe usage of mkFit after LST seeds, in a baseline HLT-like configuration.It depends on the external PR RecoTracker-MkFit/pull/20.
Configuration tested for CMS week contributions June 2026 https://indico.cern.ch/event/1690107/#93-study-on-offline-track-reco and https://indico.cern.ch/event/1690107/#93-study-on-offline-track-reco
PR validation:
Configuration tested for CMS week contributions June 2026 https://indico.cern.ch/event/1690107/#93-study-on-offline-track-reco and https://indico.cern.ch/event/1690107/#93-study-on-offline-track-reco
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
No
@mmasciov @slava77