Standardize API casing in provider change guide#11373
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Purpose
N/A (doc-only consistency fix)
Goals
Standardize “API” casing for consistency and readability.
Approach
Update the title and a few sentences to use consistent “API” capitalization.
User stories
As a reader, I want consistent terminology so the guide is easier to follow.
Release note
Standardize API casing in the provider change guide.
Documentation
N/A (this PR is documentation)
Training
N/A
Certification
N/A (doc-only)
Marketing
N/A
Automation tests
Unit tests: Not run (doc-only)
Integration tests: Not run (doc-only)
Security checks
Followed secure coding standards? N/A (doc-only)
Ran FindSecurityBugs? N/A (doc-only)
No secrets committed? Yes
Samples
N/A
Related PRs
N/A
Migrations (if applicable)
N/A
Test environment
N/A (doc-only)
Learning
N/A