Skip to content

chore: new project structure - #154

Draft
Danil42Russia wants to merge 16 commits into
masterfrom
danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn
Draft

chore: new project structure#154
Danil42Russia wants to merge 16 commits into
masterfrom
danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn

Conversation

@Danil42Russia

@Danil42Russia Danil42Russia commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue

Closes #

Checklist

Please ensure the following items are completed before requesting review:

  • Updated CHANGELOG.md with relevant changes
  • Documented the contribution in README.md
  • Added tests to demonstrate correct behavior (both positive and negative cases)
  • All tests pass successfully
  • Code passes linting checks (yarn lint)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Migrated code formatting and linting from Prettier/ESLint to Biome.
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows for improved CI/CD automation and Node.js 24 support.
    • Changed deployment trigger to tag-based releases instead of branch-based.
    • Simplified project configuration files and updated Yarn to version 4.17.0.
  • Documentation

    • Significantly expanded README with detailed examples for testing, libraries, benchmarking, and configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR upgrades Yarn to 4.17.0, replaces ESLint/Prettier with Biome for formatting and linting, updates CI workflows to use Node.js 24 and Bun-based linting with tag-triggered deployment, simplifies Yarn configuration, adds editor and Biome config files, and comprehensively refreshes README documentation examples and API guidance.

Changes

Dependency Management and Code Quality Tooling

Layer / File(s) Summary
Yarn upgrade and project config cleanup
.yarnrc.yml, .gitignore, package.json
.yarnrc.yml strips compressionLevel, enableGlobalCache, and yarnPath. .gitignore simplifies to blanket .yarn/ ignore plus yarn-error.log. packageManager bumped to yarn@4.17.0.
Biome configuration and package.json script rewiring
biome.jsonc, package.json, eslint.config.js
biome.jsonc introduced with formatter, linter, and VCS settings. package.json replaces prettier and ESLint with Biome-backed fmt/fmt:check/lint/lint:fix scripts and swaps ESLint dev dependency for @biomejs/biome. eslint.config.js export removed.
Editor, TypeScript, and examples manifest alignment
.editorconfig, tsconfig.json, examples/package.json
.editorconfig added with UTF-8/LF/2-space/100-char settings. tsconfig.json condensed to inline formatting (no semantic changes). examples/package.json reorders "private" before "scripts".

CI/CD Workflow Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Deploy tag trigger and Bun linter workflow
.github/workflows/deploy.yml, .github/workflows/linter.yml
deploy.yml switches trigger from branches: master to version-tag regex and sets empty permissions. linter.yml rewritten with Bun v1.3.14: installs via bun install --frozen-lockfile, runs bun run fmt:check and bun run lint.
Test and QA workflow standardization
.github/workflows/qa.yaml, .github/workflows/test-example.yml, .github/workflows/tests.yml
qa.yaml comments out branches: master filters. test-example.yml adds concurrency cancellation and replaces toolchain step with checkout, Corepack, and Node 24 setup. New tests.yml runs yarn run test on push/PR to master with immutable install flags.

README Documentation Refresh

Layer / File(s) Summary
README TOC, installation, and usage section
README.md (lines 9–144)
TOC reformatted with hyphenated bullets; installation adds npm i form; usage TypeScript examples for NftItem and provider patterns updated.
README test templates and matcher documentation
README.md (lines 154–255)
Basic test template updated with fee assertions; toHaveTransaction field table reformatted; NFT collection and transaction fee examples revised.
README cross-contract tests, assets, and library usage
README.md (lines 257–475)
Cross-contract assertions reformatted; "Testing key points" converted to bullet list; "Using assets in tests" refreshed; library deployment option examples updated.
README code coverage and benchmark sections
README.md (lines 487–607)
Coverage section updated with afterAll HTML report snippet; benchmark Jest reporter config refreshed; npx blueprint snapshot and gas-report.config.ts examples updated.
README sandbox pitfalls, state, snapshots, and execution
README.md (lines 634–820)
Sandbox pitfalls expand randomSeed and setVerbosityForAddress examples; snapshot helpers renamed to snapshotToSerializable/snapshotFromSerializable; sendMessageIter and loadConfig/updateConfig/setConfig examples refreshed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Poem

🐇 Hop hop, the linter's new!
Biome sweeps the old rules through,
Yarn leaps to four-seventeen,
CI tags keep deploys clean.
The README blooms, examples gleam —
A tidy warren, fresh and neat! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description uses the standard template with placeholders unfilled and no checklist items marked complete, failing to provide context about the actual changes or current status of the work. Customize the description to explain the migration scope, link to the relevant issue, and provide clarity on which checklist items have been completed.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'chore: new project structure' is vague and does not clearly convey the main changes in the changeset, which involve migrating to Yarn, adopting Biome for linting/formatting, updating GitHub Actions workflows, and restructuring configuration files. Consider a more specific title that reflects the primary changes, such as 'chore: migrate to yarn and biome' or 'chore: restructure tooling and workflows' to better communicate the scope of changes.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.yarnrc.yml (1)

10-10: 💤 Low value

Document the npmMinimalAgeGate trade-off.

The 7-day age gate improves security by avoiding newly published malicious packages, but it will also block urgent security patches and critical bug fixes for the same period. Consider documenting this trade-off in your contributing guidelines or README so maintainers understand why fresh package versions may be rejected.

If your team frequently needs to adopt critical patches, consider reducing this to 3d or 5d.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.yarnrc.yml at line 10, Add documentation explaining the npmMinimalAgeGate
setting and its trade-offs: in the project's CONTRIBUTING.md or README, describe
that npmMinimalAgeGate: 7d prevents adoption of packages published within 7 days
to reduce supply-chain risk but also delays urgent security patches, and note
recommended alternatives (e.g., 3d or 5d) and when to override the gate;
reference the configuration key npmMinimalAgeGate when explaining how to change
this behavior and include guidance for maintainers on emergency exception
procedures.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.gitignore:
- Line 11: The repo currently ignores the entire .yarn/ directory but
examples/.gitignore tries to un-ignore some subfolders while leaving .yarn/cache
still ignored, breaking zero-install; update the gitignore rules to be
consistent: either explicitly un-ignore .yarn/cache (and keep the other
un-ignore entries for patches/plugins/releases/sdks/versions) if you want
zero-install/offline support, or remove the examples' un-ignore exceptions so
they match the root intent of ignoring .yarn/; adjust the root .gitignore and
examples/.gitignore accordingly so .yarn/cache treatment is aligned across the
repo.

In @.yarnrc.yml:
- Around line 1-2: approvedGitRepositories currently uses a dangerous catch‑all
wildcard ("**"); update the .yarnrc.yml setting so approvedGitRepositories only
lists the exact Git hosts or repo patterns you trust (e.g., your org or specific
repo like the-ton-tech/toolchain) instead of "**". Edit the
approvedGitRepositories entry to remove the wildcard and add the minimal set of
allowed repository patterns (hostnames or org/repo globs) that correspond to
your actual Git dependencies, ensuring the `@ton/toolchain` dependency source
(the-ton-tech/toolchain) is explicitly whitelisted.
- Line 6: The .yarnrc.yml setting enableScripts: false will suppress lifecycle
scripts; validate that no transitive dependencies require postinstall by running
yarn install locally and inspecting for Yarn script-suppression warnings
(YN0004) and any failed installs, and if you find a package that needs lifecycle
scripts either set enableScripts: true in .yarnrc.yml or add a repository note
documenting the intentional suppression and the specific package(s) changed;
reference the enableScripts key in .yarnrc.yml when making the change or note.

In `@package.json`:
- Line 69: CI is failing because packageManager specifies yarn@4.16.0 but
Corepack is not enabled in workflows; update all GitHub Actions workflow files
that run yarn (e.g., .github/workflows/publish-dev.yml and any other workflow
invoking yarn) to add a step that runs "corepack enable" after actions/checkout
and setup-node but before any yarn commands, ensuring Corepack is enabled so the
pinned Yarn version from the packageManager field is used during installs and
other yarn invocations.

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.yarnrc.yml:
- Line 10: Add documentation explaining the npmMinimalAgeGate setting and its
trade-offs: in the project's CONTRIBUTING.md or README, describe that
npmMinimalAgeGate: 7d prevents adoption of packages published within 7 days to
reduce supply-chain risk but also delays urgent security patches, and note
recommended alternatives (e.g., 3d or 5d) and when to override the gate;
reference the configuration key npmMinimalAgeGate when explaining how to change
this behavior and include guidance for maintainers on emergency exception
procedures.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4d32c5ab-562a-41f4-b2a8-98e2f2f369c1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e284e02 and c90ae0e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.2.cjs is excluded by !**/.yarn/**
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .gitignore
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • package.json

Comment thread .gitignore Outdated
Comment thread .yarnrc.yml Outdated
Comment thread .yarnrc.yml Outdated
Comment thread package.json Outdated
@Danil42Russia
Danil42Russia force-pushed the danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn branch from c90ae0e to baad9e4 Compare June 17, 2026 19:45

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
package.json (1)

62-62: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

CI workflows still missing Corepack setup.

The pipeline failures confirm that the Test Example and QA workflows are using global Yarn 1.22.22 instead of the pinned Yarn 4.17.0 because Corepack is not enabled in those workflows. While the deploy workflow has been updated with corepack enable, other workflows still need this step.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@package.json` at line 62, The Test Example and QA workflows are not enabling
Corepack, which causes them to use the global Yarn 1.22.22 instead of the pinned
Yarn 4.17.0 specified in package.json. Add a corepack enable step to both the
Test Example workflow and QA workflow files, positioning it before any Yarn
commands are executed, similar to how it was added in the deploy workflow. This
will ensure these workflows use the correct pinned Yarn version.

Source: Pipeline failures

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 62: The Yarn 4.17.0 upgrade changes the default value of enableScripts to
false, which could prevent install scripts from running on dependencies that
require them. Verify that no dependencies in the project rely on custom install
scripts by testing the build process thoroughly. If dependencies do require
install scripts to function properly, explicitly set enableScripts to true in
the .yarnrc.yml configuration file. Additionally, review the updated default
behavior for npmMinimalAgeGate and adjust it in .yarnrc.yml if necessary to
match the project's requirements.

---

Duplicate comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 62: The Test Example and QA workflows are not enabling Corepack, which
causes them to use the global Yarn 1.22.22 instead of the pinned Yarn 4.17.0
specified in package.json. Add a corepack enable step to both the Test Example
workflow and QA workflow files, positioning it before any Yarn commands are
executed, similar to how it was added in the deploy workflow. This will ensure
these workflows use the correct pinned Yarn version.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 33abf3f3-8a4d-45be-b6c1-b64f840f439c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c90ae0e and baad9e4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.2.cjs is excluded by !**/.yarn/**
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .gitignore
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • package.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .gitignore

Comment thread package.json Outdated

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)

11-17: ⚡ Quick win

Set explicit least-privilege workflow permissions.

This workflow currently relies on repository default GITHUB_TOKEN permissions. Define explicit read-only scope to reduce accidental write access.

Proposed fix
 concurrency:
   group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
   cancel-in-progress: true

+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
 jobs:
   test:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/tests.yml around lines 11 - 17, The GitHub Actions
workflow in tests.yml is missing explicit least-privilege permissions
configuration. Add a permissions section at the workflow level (after the
concurrency section and before the jobs section) that explicitly defines
read-only access by setting contents: read to restrict the GITHUB_TOKEN to only
read permissions, following the principle of least privilege and reducing the
risk of accidental write access.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Nitpick comments:
In @.github/workflows/tests.yml:
- Around line 11-17: The GitHub Actions workflow in tests.yml is missing
explicit least-privilege permissions configuration. Add a permissions section at
the workflow level (after the concurrency section and before the jobs section)
that explicitly defines read-only access by setting contents: read to restrict
the GITHUB_TOKEN to only read permissions, following the principle of least
privilege and reducing the risk of accidental write access.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: efd18445-ae58-4003-9695-b69151732969

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between baad9e4 and 735bde1.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/qa.yaml
  • .github/workflows/test-example.yml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml

@Danil42Russia
Danil42Russia force-pushed the danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn branch from c99bc95 to cfa42c2 Compare June 19, 2026 19:19

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)

186-186: 💤 Low value

Prefer "cannot" over "can not".

Use the single-word form for cleaner readability.

Fix wording
-| inMessageBounceable | boolean?      | Boolean flag Bounceable. True - message can be bounced, False - message can not be bounced.                                                                                                                                  |
+| inMessageBounceable | boolean?      | Boolean flag Bounceable. True - message can be bounced, False - message cannot be bounced.                                                                                                                                  |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 186, In the README.md file, locate the inMessageBounceable
row in the table and change the wording in its description from "message can not
be bounced" to "message cannot be bounced". The single-word form "cannot"
provides cleaner readability than the two-word form "can not".

Source: Linters/SAST tools


702-702: 💤 Low value

Add language identifier to fenced code block.

Code blocks should declare their language for syntax highlighting.

Fix missing language identifier
-```
+```typescript
 async setShardAccount(address: Address, account: ShardAccount)
-```
+```
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 702, The fenced code block containing the setShardAccount
method is missing a language identifier for proper syntax highlighting. Add
"typescript" immediately after the opening triple backticks (```) on the line
before the async setShardAccount function declaration to declare the code block
language.

Source: Linters/SAST tools


44-44: 💤 Low value

Add language identifier to fenced code block.

Code blocks should declare their language for syntax highlighting.

Fix missing language identifier
-```
+```bash
 yarn add `@ton/sandbox` `@ton/ton` `@ton/core` `@ton/crypto`
-```
+```
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 44, The fenced code block containing the yarn add command
is missing a language identifier for syntax highlighting. Locate the opening
code fence marker (```) immediately before the line containing "yarn add
`@ton/sandbox` `@ton/ton` `@ton/core` `@ton/crypto`" and add "bash" as the language
identifier so it reads ```bash instead of just ```.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/linter.yml:
- Around line 11-18: The workflow is missing an explicit permissions block,
which means it uses repository or organization default token permissions instead
of principle of least privilege. Add a permissions block at the workflow level
after the concurrency configuration and before the jobs section. Set permissions
to only those required for the workflow to function (typically read-only
permissions like contents: read for linting workflows), ensuring the CI pipeline
follows security best practices with minimal token scope.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 186: In the README.md file, locate the inMessageBounceable row in the
table and change the wording in its description from "message can not be
bounced" to "message cannot be bounced". The single-word form "cannot" provides
cleaner readability than the two-word form "can not".
- Line 702: The fenced code block containing the setShardAccount method is
missing a language identifier for proper syntax highlighting. Add "typescript"
immediately after the opening triple backticks (```) on the line before the
async setShardAccount function declaration to declare the code block language.
- Line 44: The fenced code block containing the yarn add command is missing a
language identifier for syntax highlighting. Locate the opening code fence
marker (```) immediately before the line containing "yarn add `@ton/sandbox`
`@ton/ton` `@ton/core` `@ton/crypto`" and add "bash" as the language identifier so it
reads ```bash instead of just ```.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 82fbc1d4-b79f-45d7-a7e8-327d087e2e05

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 735bde1 and cfa42c2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.2.cjs is excluded by !**/.yarn/**
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • .editorconfig
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .github/workflows/linter.yml
  • .github/workflows/qa.yaml
  • .github/workflows/test-example.yml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
  • .gitignore
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • README.md
  • biome.json
  • eslint.config.js
  • examples/package.json
  • package.json
  • tsconfig.json
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/qa.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • tsconfig.json
  • .editorconfig
  • biome.json
  • .gitignore
  • examples/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/test-example.yml
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml

Comment thread .github/workflows/linter.yml

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/linter.yml:
- Around line 30-33: The `oven-sh/setup-bun` action is using a mutable tag
reference `@v2` instead of a SHA-pinned commit, which exposes the workflow to
supply chain attacks. Navigate to the GitHub releases page for oven-sh/setup-bun
to find the current commit SHA for the v2 release, then replace the `uses:
oven-sh/setup-bun@v2` line with the full commit SHA in the format `uses:
oven-sh/setup-bun@<full_commit_sha>` and add a comment indicating the
corresponding version (e.g., # v2.2.0).

In `@package.json`:
- Line 29: The fmt:check script in package.json currently uses biome format,
which modifies files in-place instead of performing a check-only verification.
Replace the biome format command in the fmt:check script with biome check, which
verifies that files are properly formatted without making modifications and
exits with a non-zero code if formatting issues are found, making it suitable
for use as a quality gate in the CI/CD pipeline.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 89c00497-25a4-482f-9735-b25ab520d6a4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfa42c2 and 9a14223.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/linter.yml
  • .gitignore
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • biome.jsonc
  • eslint.config.js
  • package.json
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • eslint.config.js
  • .gitignore

Comment thread .github/workflows/linter.yml
Comment thread package.json
@Danil42Russia
Danil42Russia force-pushed the danil42russia/migrate_to_yarn branch from 4e28856 to 5e4da9e Compare June 19, 2026 20:36
@Danil42Russia Danil42Russia changed the title chore: migrate to yarn new project structure Jun 19, 2026
@Danil42Russia Danil42Russia changed the title new project structure chore: new project structure Jun 19, 2026
@Danil42Russia
Danil42Russia marked this pull request as draft June 19, 2026 23:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant