Skip to content

feat: [AG-322] Add Studio Integration Name#6939

Open
dan-arpino wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/track-studio-integration
Open

feat: [AG-322] Add Studio Integration Name#6939
dan-arpino wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/track-studio-integration

Conversation

@dan-arpino

@dan-arpino dan-arpino commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Submission Checklist

  • Follows CONTRIBUTING guidelines
  • Commit messages
    are release-note ready, emphasizing
    what was changed, not how.
  • Includes detailed description of changes
  • Contains risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)
  • Highlights breaking API changes (if applicable)
  • Links to automated tests covering new functionality
  • Includes manual testing instructions (if necessary)
  • Updates relevant GitBook documentation (PR link: ___)
  • Includes product update to be announced in the next stable release notes

What does this PR do?

Adding STUDIO as a Tracked Integration

Where should the reviewer start?

Only change is to sources.ts

How should this be manually tested?

What's the product update that needs to be communicated to CLI users?

No Update Needed

Risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)?

Low

Any background context you want to provide?

STUDIO integration is used for Snyk Studio background Secure At Inception Hooks

What are the relevant tickets?

AG-322

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Adding `STUDIO` as a tracked integration to measure Snyk Studio usage
@dan-arpino dan-arpino force-pushed the feat/track-studio-integration branch from 64cbb97 to 07c4112 Compare June 24, 2026 22:37
@dan-arpino dan-arpino marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2026 22:37
@dan-arpino dan-arpino requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2026 22:37
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Warnings
⚠️

You've modified files in src/ directory, but haven't updated anything in test folder. Is there something that could be tested?

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 07c4112

@snyk-pr-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Missing Tests 🟡 [minor]

The PR adds a new integration name 'STUDIO' to the 'TrackedIntegration' enum but does not include any accompanying tests. According to the project's 'AGENTS.md' and 'dangerfile.js', modifications to the 'src/' directory should be accompanied by corresponding test changes in 'test/'. A test case should be added to ensure 'getIntegrationName' correctly parses 'STUDIO' from environment variables or flags.

STUDIO = 'STUDIO',
📚 Repository Context Analyzed

This review considered 4 relevant code sections from 3 files (average relevance: 0.59)

🤖 Repository instructions applied (from AGENTS.md)

@dan-arpino dan-arpino enabled auto-merge June 24, 2026 22:39
@danskmt danskmt disabled auto-merge June 25, 2026 09:19
@danskmt danskmt self-requested a review June 25, 2026 09:22
Comment on lines +61 to 63
// Studio integration
STUDIO = 'STUDIO',
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please double check if this change is really required: do we need this in analytics v1?
Also, maybe you want to use chore instead of feat in the commit message

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants