Proper RR typechecker - #19290
Conversation
7af1ed2 to
6b57170
Compare
|
It remains to be decided of what to do when the rule breaks SR: right now, coqc emits a warning but coqchk fails (hence the test failures) |
|
The "needs: rebase" label was set more than 30 days ago. If the PR is not rebased in 30 days, it will be automatically closed. |
88bbeb9 to
0fe4e64
Compare
0fe4e64 to
08a6c99
Compare
08a6c99 to
17a27d3
Compare
a405d62 to
bfdd6a6
Compare
|
I marked the PR as open for review, even though it fails to compile starting from commit 6. |
bfdd6a6 to
053eddf
Compare
053eddf to
9119a2c
Compare
9119a2c to
1895dfe
Compare
|
The "needs: rebase" label was set more than 30 days ago. If the PR is not rebased in 30 days, it will be automatically closed. |
1895dfe to
c168b46
Compare
|
The "needs: rebase" label was set more than 30 days ago. If the PR is not rebased in 30 days, it will be automatically closed. |
|
What's the policy (or what should the policy be) regarding the minimum that rocqchk should verify for constr ?
|
|
rocqchk could just fail if there are rewrite rules |
|
This PR was not rebased after 30 days despite the warning, it is now closed. |
|
@coqbot run full ci |
Overlays: