Remove misplaced Proof commands for Rocq dev - #54
Draft
JasonGross wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Rocq now rejects a `Proof.` that is not the first command of an
interactive proof ("Proof" must be the first command in an interactive
proof). Two proofs had a stray `Proof.` after their opening tactics.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01L9BGQT7XUuubV6C619DW4b
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove two
Proof.commands that Rocq dev rejects after interactive proof commands inOneStep.vandOrderedCover.v.Commit b706030 passes a clean package build on Rocq dev (9.4+alpha):
Produced by a Claude coding agent and validated by OpenAI Codex.
Wordsmithed by Codex.