Refactor DistributedSlackOuterLoop reports when handling several SC - #1473
Open
bperr wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Refactor DistributedSlackOuterLoop reports when handling several SC#1473bperr wants to merge 1 commit into
bperr wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…hronous component Signed-off-by: b.perreyon <baptiste.perreyon@supergrid-institute.com>
|
bperr
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 27, 2026 15:16
SylvestreSakti
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2026
SylvestreSakti
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for solving this !
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Minor feature change, not covered in the last PR : clean reports for distributed slack outer loop when there are several SC
What is the current behavior?
Report structure is
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
New structure is
Please not that a SC is not added if there is no report inside.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?