qperf tool#1600
Conversation
|
This will probably have to wait until after the first of the year for me to get to it. |
|
While testing on RDMA enabled machines, noticed that I have to implement additionl params for the qperf tool. |
|
Thought about this some after our discussion last week: ThroughputProtocols supported by Qperf:
New
I don't see any difficulties in getting Qperf integrated for measuring throughput. Latency TestsProtocols supported by Qperf:
Parameters:
The I don't think we'd have to make any major architectural changes to get Qperf running two-participant latency tests. There would have to be some implementation changes that are not trivial but aren't a show-stopper. Worst case, we put Qperf latency on the back burner until pScheduler can handle tool-dependent participant counts. Other TestsI'm going to hand-wave these for the moment:
|
Will update the code to reflect this.
For now - skipping latency integration for qperf. Will ping you when changes are made. |
|
@mfeit-internet2 |
#1581
For now only throughput tests are available.
RDMA not tested - don`t have the infra for that.