Skip to content

OSDOCS-19483] Addresses comment made for OSDOCS 19483#111695

Open
stevsmit wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
stevsmit:19483-OSDOCS
Open

OSDOCS-19483] Addresses comment made for OSDOCS 19483#111695
stevsmit wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
stevsmit:19483-OSDOCS

Conversation

@stevsmit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@stevsmit stevsmit commented May 14, 2026

Just looking for a review. Do not merge. I will merge this PR.

Version(s):
4.22+

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-19483

Link to docs preview:
https://111695--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/ingress_load_balancing/configuring_ingress_cluster_traffic/ingress-gateway-api.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 14, 2026
@stevsmit stevsmit added this to the Continuous Release milestone May 14, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 14, 2026

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented May 15, 2026

@stevsmit: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stevsmit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

SME approval:

Ricardo Pchevuzinske Katz  [8:48 AM]
yeah sounds good!

@stevsmit stevsmit added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label May 15, 2026
@stevsmit stevsmit changed the title Addresses comment made for OSDOCS 19483 OSDOCS-19483] Addresses comment made for OSDOCS 19483 May 15, 2026
@stevsmit stevsmit added the do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. label May 15, 2026
@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels May 15, 2026
+
[NOTE]
====
The difference between highly available and non-highly-available topologies is the minimum number of replicas: at least two on highly available clusters, and one on clusters that do not use a highly available topology. Either topology can scale a gateway deployment out to ten replicas.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Using at least might be redundant since you have already specified minimum number.
This is nitty nit. So all good to merge. :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Will definitely consider this after dev review! :)

@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels May 15, 2026
+
[NOTE]
====
The difference between highly available and non-highly-available topologies is the minimum number of replicas: at least two on highly available clusters, and one on clusters that do not use a highly available topology. Either topology can scale a gateway deployment out to ten replicas.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Steve, if you mention either topology can scale to 10, then it will be not non ha (it will become redundant cluster). so better make similar to below.

The difference between high available and non-high-available topologies is the minimum number of replicas: at least two gateway instances on high available clusters(which can scale out to ten replicas), and only one gateway instance on the cluster that do not use a high available topology.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kindly make necessary changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.22 do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. ok-to-merge size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants