Skip to content

Refactor code by move start thread fetcher to show event#187

Open
Czaki wants to merge 3 commits into
napari:mainfrom
Czaki:fix_worker_start
Open

Refactor code by move start thread fetcher to show event#187
Czaki wants to merge 3 commits into
napari:mainfrom
Czaki:fix_worker_start

Conversation

@Czaki
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Czaki Czaki commented Oct 15, 2025

No description provided.

@Czaki Czaki marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2025 11:21
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.03%. Comparing base (77e126d) to head (222ed37).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/napari_plugin_manager/base_qt_plugin_dialog.py 70.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #187      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.14%   93.03%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        2187     2198      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         2037     2045       +8     
- Misses        150      153       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Czaki Czaki marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2025 12:26
@TimMonko TimMonko changed the title Refactor code by moe start thread fetcher to show event Refactor code by move start thread fetcher to show event Oct 15, 2025
Comment on lines +1780 to +1783
if self.worker is not None and self.worker.is_running:
self.worker.terminate()
self.worker.wait()
self.worker = None
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will cancel ongoing tasks, right? That would go against the idea of background tasks in #174

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants