Skip to content

Bump Node.js to 22 in code-quality workflow - #1321

Open
Konstantinos Passadis | Azure MVP | MCT (passadis) wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
passadis:main
Open

Bump Node.js to 22 in code-quality workflow#1321
Konstantinos Passadis | Azure MVP | MCT (passadis) wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
passadis:main

Conversation

@passadis

This pull request updates the Node.js version used in the code quality workflow to ensure compatibility with newer features and dependencies.

Workflow environment update:

Copilot AI and others added 3 commits August 6, 2026 22:45
Co-authored-by: passadis <53148138+passadis@users.noreply.github.com>
ci: bump Node.js to 22 in code-quality workflow
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 22:49

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Warning

Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.

Updates the Node.js version used in the code-quality GitHub Actions workflow to Node.js 22 for compatibility with newer tooling/dependencies.

Changes:

  • Bumped actions/setup-node node-version from 20 to 22 in the code-quality workflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@passadis

Konstantinos Passadis | Azure MVP | MCT (passadis) commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Lee Stott (@leestott) is this good to merge ? Thank you !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants