Skip to content

Fix: #121 Prefer full HDF5 dataset paths as DataFrame column names#169

Open
Dhanush010 wants to merge 3 commits into
idtlab:developfrom
Dhanush010:fix/hdf5-full-path-columns
Open

Fix: #121 Prefer full HDF5 dataset paths as DataFrame column names#169
Dhanush010 wants to merge 3 commits into
idtlab:developfrom
Dhanush010:fix/hdf5-full-path-columns

Conversation

@Dhanush010

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Related Issues / Pull Requests

Follow-up to #121 (EQSIM/rechdf5 HDF5 path context)
Builds on #118 (dataset selection / no blind flatten)

Description

Prefer full HDF5 dataset paths as DataFrame column names when reading selected datasets (for example S_01_01/X instead of X).

This preserves station/group context for EQSIM-style hierarchical files so columns from different groups stay distinguishable. Valid zero fill behavior from #118 is unchanged.

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected; for instance, examples in this repository must be updated too)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code modifies existing public API, or introduces new public API, and I updated or wrote documentation
  • I have commented my code
  • My code requires documentation updates, and I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@Dhanush010
Dhanush010 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2026 17:20
@Dhanush010
Dhanush010 requested a review from jeanbez July 24, 2026 17:20
@jeanbez
jeanbez requested a review from houjun July 24, 2026 17:47
@houjun
houjun requested a review from Copilot July 24, 2026 17:49

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants