Skip to content

Docs: consistant charger naming#21684

Merged
andig merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/charger_naming
Jun 6, 2025
Merged

Docs: consistant charger naming#21684
andig merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/charger_naming

Conversation

@naltatis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@naltatis naltatis commented Jun 6, 2025

relates to #21670

Cleaning up product brands and descriptions.

  • brand field only contains the actual brand name itself (relevant vor website).
  • product description matches the commonly used product name as used by the brand or in online shops.
  • different product lines have dedicated product entries

@daniel309 can you double check my Luxtronic modifications. I had some trouble finding the right devices from the manufacturers websites (e.g. Aeroplus). I added some infos from the description of your Luxtronic PR. If you have more infos no the devices just comment them here.

@naltatis naltatis added the devices Specific device support label Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @naltatis - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment thread templates/definition/charger/luxtronik.yaml
@naltatis naltatis requested a review from premultiply June 6, 2025 15:42
Comment thread templates/definition/charger/luxtronik.yaml
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daniel309 daniel309 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm (for luxtronik.yaml)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@premultiply premultiply left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Keine Einwände :) LGTM

Ich glaub die ganzen veralteten Wallbe-Templates aus den frühen Anfangstagen können wir auch demnächst mal löschen.
Das sollte heute alles intern mit der aktuellen Phoenix-Implementierung abgehandelt sein.

@andig andig merged commit c520195 into master Jun 6, 2025
6 checks passed
@andig andig deleted the docs/charger_naming branch June 6, 2025 20:05
andig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
StarF666 pushed a commit to StarF666/evcc that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

devices Specific device support

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants