Skip to content

Bump databricks-sdk-go from v0.170.0 to v0.171.0 - #6320

Merged
shreyas-goenka merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
bump-sdk-0.171.0
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Bump databricks-sdk-go from v0.170.0 to v0.171.0#6320
shreyas-goenka merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
bump-sdk-0.171.0

Conversation

@shreyas-goenka

@shreyas-goenka shreyas-goenka commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Regenerate the pinned OpenAPI spec SHA, CLI command stubs, bundle JSON schema, validation code, direct-engine resources, the DABs field map, and pydabs Python models to match v0.171.0. Notable surface changes: catalog McpService/ModelProviderService/ModelService drop the browse fields (IncludeBrowse/BrowseOnly); jobs gain triggers and ai_runtime_task fields; pipelines gain an API source connector; apps gains forward_user_access_token.

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Co-authored-by: Isaac
@shreyas-goenka
shreyas-goenka marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2026 11:14
Handle new SDK fields surfaced by the v0.171.0 bump in the direct engine: add jobs.CreateJob.Triggers to makeCreateJob (exhaustruct), add jobs.Job.TriggerDetails to JobRemote and makeJobRemote (TestJobRemote coverage), and add apps forward_user_access_token to UpdateMaskFields (TestAppDoUpdate; updates the apps update goldens). Drop the now-redundant model_serving_endpoints telemetry_config.table_names ignore_remote_changes entry from resources.yml since resources.generated.yml now produces it.

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Adding jobs.Job.TriggerDetails to JobRemote surfaces resources.jobs.*.trigger_details.* as REMOTE fields; regenerate out.fields.txt to match (validate-generated / generate-check).

Co-authored-by: Isaac
@shreyas-goenka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

integration tests are passing.

@shreyas-goenka
shreyas-goenka merged commit 0e992d8 into main Aug 19, 2026
39 of 40 checks passed
@shreyas-goenka
shreyas-goenka deleted the bump-sdk-0.171.0 branch August 19, 2026 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants