Skip to content

feat: loom v0.0.8, multi-model catalog, default daemon start#14

Open
yzs15 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/loom-v0.0.8-multimodel-catalog
Open

feat: loom v0.0.8, multi-model catalog, default daemon start#14
yzs15 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/loom-v0.0.8-multimodel-catalog

Conversation

@yzs15

@yzs15 yzs15 commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Loom v0.0.8: bump LOOM_RELEASE and SHA256 hashes across Linux/Windows packaging scripts and Inno Setup
  • Multi-model catalog: replace single-model glm-catalog.json with model-catalog.json covering gpt-5.5, deepseek-v4-pro, and glm-5.2; unconditionally provision catalog for all proxy-served models; clean up legacy file on upgrade
  • Default daemon start: call loom.StartDriverDaemon() in launcher, headless driver, and update slave process to use serve-daemon --config invocation
  • Docs: add docs/build-windows-installer.md documenting the Windows EXE packaging workflow

Test plan

  • go test ./internal/codex/ ./internal/vscode/ ./internal/headless/ ./internal/slave/ ./internal/loom/ — all pass
  • Built agentserver-app-0.1.2-setup.exe via make package
  • Deployed and installed on test machine Administrator@9.0.16.110 — all 28 files in place

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… default daemon start

- Bump LOOM_RELEASE to v0.0.8 with updated SHA256 across linux/windows packaging
- Replace single-model glm-catalog.json with multi-model model-catalog.json
  covering gpt-5.5, deepseek-v4-pro, and glm-5.2
- Unconditionally provision model catalog for all proxy-served models instead
  of gating on glm-5.2 slug — removes the conditional catalog logic
- Clean up legacy glm-catalog.json on first provision of new catalog
- Start driver daemon by default in launcher and headless driver paths
- Update slave process to use "serve-daemon --config" invocation
- Add build-windows-installer.md documenting the EXE packaging workflow

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant