Skip to content

test(rocsparse): mark csrilu0/csric0/bsric0_graph_test as known_bug#9271

Merged
jsandham merged 2 commits into
ROCm:developfrom
ntrost57:users/ntrost57/oom_known_issue
Jul 10, 2026
Merged

test(rocsparse): mark csrilu0/csric0/bsric0_graph_test as known_bug#9271
jsandham merged 2 commits into
ROCm:developfrom
ntrost57:users/ntrost57/oom_known_issue

Conversation

@ntrost57

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Move the hipGraph solve/factor graph_test cases (the graph_test: true
variants) of bsric0, csric0, and csrilu0 to category: known_bug. On
memory-constrained GPUs such as the gfx110X family
(gfx1100/gfx1101/gfx1102/gfx1103), these cases fail with hipErrorOutOfMemory
in hipGraphLaunch, which repeatedly blocks rocm-librariesROCm/TheRock
bump PRs.

Why

Temporary workaround

This does not fix the underlying memory usage of the graph capture/launch
path — it only unblocks CI. Restoring each test is a one-line change back to
category: pre_checkin. #9143 tracks the real fix.

Trade-off / alternative considered

known_bug disables these graph_test cases on all architectures and OSes,
including the ones where they currently pass, so that coverage is lost until the
tests are re-enabled. The alternative is a gfx110X-only exclusion via the
skip_hardware YAML option, which preserves coverage everywhere except the
affected cards; it was not used here because a partial-prefix skip_hardware
value is non-standard for this repo. Happy to switch to that approach instead if
maintainers prefer.

Test plan

  • Config-only change to test_bsric0.yaml, test_csric0.yaml, and
    test_csrilu0.yaml; no source code changed (no new unit test required per repo
    policy).
  • known_bug cases are excluded from the standard/pre_checkin suites, so the
    gfx110X OOM no longer fails the run.

Made with Cursor

@ntrost57 ntrost57 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2026 14:27
@ntrost57 ntrost57 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2026 14:31
@therock-pr-bot

therock-pr-bot Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ All Checks Passed — Ready for Review

Check Status Details
🌿 Branch Name ✅ Pass
📝 PR Title/Description ✅ Pass
Forbidden Files ✅ Pass
🧪 Unit Test ✅ Pass PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit ✅ Pass
🚫 Draft PR 🔜 To Be Enabled
🚩 Feature Flag 🔜 To Be Enabled
📊 Code Coverage 🔜 To Be Enabled
🤖 therock-pr-bot ✅ Pass

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

@therock-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (76.92%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #9271   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    64.99%   64.99%           
========================================
  Files         2685     2685           
  Lines       422111   422111           
  Branches     62707    62707           
========================================
  Hits        274339   274339           
  Misses      127073   127073           
  Partials     20699    20699           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
TensileLite 34.86% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipBLAS 90.81% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipBLASLt 34.71% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipCUB 82.68% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipDNN 86.15% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipFFT 50.88% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipRAND 76.12% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipSOLVER 69.18% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
hipSPARSE 86.10% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
rocBLAS 47.91% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
rocFFT 50.80% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
rocRAND 57.02% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
rocSOLVER 76.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502
rocSPARSE 72.37% <ø> (ø)
rocThrust 91.36% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4c61502

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jsandham jsandham merged commit 0b1bd76 into ROCm:develop Jul 10, 2026
35 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants