[#669] Declarative partial update use case - #958
Open
jamesnw wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
jamesnw
requested review from
malchata,
philipwalton and
rviscomi
as code owners
June 18, 2026 18:40
Merged
tunetheweb
requested changes
Jul 6, 2026
tunetheweb
left a comment
tunetheweb
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See comment here regarding whether we should even add this yet:
But maybe it's OK to add this simple use case? But I have a few comments on that first.
Co-authored-by: Barry Pollard <barrypollard@google.com>
Member
|
@jamesnw is this ready for another review? |
…dance-src into 669-declarative-partial-update
Contributor
Author
@rviscomi Yes, but the blocker is now this question, on whether it is too early to add this to MWG. |
Member
Ah ok, I missed that. I'll reply there. Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A full use case here would require a server streaming HTML slowly, which seems out of scope for this project. Would it suffice to have the demo just show the fully loaded HTML, which would still demonstrate the template replacement? The demo.html here copied from the official example shows what I mean. The guide could mention the server needs but not include code for the server side.
I suspect this won't pass CI without a web feature.
Also, should this be in performance rather than UX?