Hi, I am attempting to reproduce the EuRoC results from the paper using the provided Docker image and wanted to report a consistent reproducibility gap.
Setup:
- Docker image:
xukuanhit/air_slam:v4
- TensorRT 8.6.1.6, CUDA 12.1
- GPU: RTX 4060
- Full pipeline (VO + map refinement)
- Evaluation:
evo_ape euroc --align --correct_scale
Results (RMSE):
| Sequence |
Mine |
Paper |
| MH_01_easy |
0.039m |
0.019m |
| V1_03_difficult |
0.069m |
0.025m |
| V2_02_medium |
0.056m |
0.018m |
Things already tried:
- Rebuilt TensorRT engines from scratch
- Increased TensorRT workspace size to 4GB in all network builders (
plnet.cpp, light_glue.cpp, super_point.cpp)
- Verified evaluation format (TUM vs EuRoC) — negligible difference
Is there something specific about how the engines were built or any configuration not covered in the README that might explain this gap?
Hi, I am attempting to reproduce the EuRoC results from the paper using the provided Docker image and wanted to report a consistent reproducibility gap.
Setup:
xukuanhit/air_slam:v4evo_ape euroc --align --correct_scaleResults (RMSE):
Things already tried:
plnet.cpp,light_glue.cpp,super_point.cpp)Is there something specific about how the engines were built or any configuration not covered in the README that might explain this gap?