Hi, I'm trying to reproduce the results from the paper using the provided command for STBLLM on LLaMA-2-7B with the Wikitext-2 dataset.
When running without sparsity, the command:
python3 run.py /home/models/llama2-7b wikitext2 braq \
--blocksize 128 \
--salient_metric hessian \
--prune_method si_structure \
--reconstruction \
--sparsity_type 4:8
produces a reasonable perplexity (PPL) of 10.1.
However, when I enable structured sparsity with --sparsity_ratio 0.5:
python3 run.py /home/models/llama2-7b wikitext2 braq \
--blocksize 128 \
--salient_metric hessian \
--prune_method si_structure \
--reconstruction \
--sparsity_ratio 0.5 \
--sparsity_type 4:8
the PPL jumps dramatically to 178.6, which seems inconsistent with the results reported in the paper :
Could you help clarify:
Whether this behavior is expected?
If there are additional hyperparameters or steps needed when applying 4:8 sparsity with BRAGPTQ?
Or if there might be a bug or version mismatch causing this discrepancy?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Hi, I'm trying to reproduce the results from the paper using the provided command for STBLLM on LLaMA-2-7B with the Wikitext-2 dataset.
When running without sparsity, the command:
produces a reasonable perplexity (PPL) of 10.1.
However, when I enable structured sparsity with --sparsity_ratio 0.5:
the PPL jumps dramatically to 178.6, which seems inconsistent with the results reported in the paper :
Could you help clarify:
Whether this behavior is expected?
If there are additional hyperparameters or steps needed when applying 4:8 sparsity with BRAGPTQ?
Or if there might be a bug or version mismatch causing this discrepancy?
Thanks in advance for your help!