Rank library results by name or size

[Popolechien]

New users have no way of knowing what the various flavours mean, and searching for "Wikipedia" returns a long list of unordered results (the maxi wikipedia currently ranks 10th on my phone, mini 3rd, and nopic way down)

Ordering does not seem to be by creation date either (with or without search). This is rightfully confusing for users.

A fix would be to group files either:

• by name (irrespective of the date), e.g. all wikipedia_en_all first, then wikipedia_en_basketball (or whatever comes alphabetically);
• or by file size (largest always on top).

[kelson42]

I'm not in favour of this. Problem is here. But solution is not the right one I suspect.

[Popolechien]

So what's the alternative, and how can it be implemented fairly quickly? It's always a matter of tradeoffs, and a perfect solution in 3 years is not as good as an imperfect fix in 3 weeks.

[gouri-panda]

Maybe group together with download popularity?

[kelson42]

New users have no way of knowing what the various flavours mean

So "text only" is not self-explaining? If the current label are not clear, then we have to propose a better way.

This issue is like many others: it does not really explain the issue, the problematic use case.

@Popolechien explain clearly what is the problem:

• what you do
• what you get
• what you expect

The two first are clear, but the last one is not.