|
1 | 1 | # Gamma.app Slide Deck Update Prompt |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | Paste the prompt below into Gamma.app to update the **AI-Powered Student Success Analytics** slide deck. |
| 4 | +The current deck has 13 slides. This prompt tells you exactly what to change on each slide. |
4 | 5 |
|
5 | 6 | --- |
6 | 7 |
|
7 | | -## Prompt |
| 8 | +## Overall Framing |
8 | 9 |
|
9 | | -Update the existing "AI-Powered Student Success Analytics" slide deck for the CodeBenders Datathon submission. The platform has been fully built and deployed. Replace any draft/planned framing with current, delivered-state language. Apply the following changes slide by slide, then ensure visual consistency throughout. |
| 10 | +- The platform is **live and deployed** for **Bishop State Community College (BSCC)**, a historically Black community college in Mobile, Alabama (~4,000 students/year). It is **not** a multi-institution prototype. |
| 11 | +- Remove University of Akron and KCTCS as co-equal institutions. They may appear only as "future institution onboarding" examples. |
| 12 | +- Replace all "will build / planned / customize for your context" language with "built / delivered / live." |
| 13 | +- Add Bishop State's colors (navy and gold) as accent colors where appropriate. |
10 | 14 |
|
11 | 15 | --- |
12 | 16 |
|
13 | | -### Overall Framing Changes |
14 | | - |
15 | | -- The platform is no longer described as a multi-institution prototype. It is a **live, deployed system built for Bishop State Community College (BSCC)**, a historically Black community college in Mobile, Alabama (~4,000 students/year). It is designed to extend to other PDP institutions. |
16 | | -- Remove or de-emphasize KCTCS as a co-equal institution. References to University of Akron and KCTCS can appear as "future institution onboarding" examples only. |
17 | | -- Replace any "we will build" or "planned" language with "we built" and "delivered." |
| 17 | +## Slide-by-Slide Instructions |
18 | 18 |
|
19 | 19 | --- |
20 | 20 |
|
21 | | -### Slide: Title / Cover |
| 21 | +### Slide 1 — Title / Cover |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +**Current:** "AI-Powered Student Success Analytics · Transforming higher education data into actionable insights that improve student readiness, retention, and institutional outcomes · Team CodeBenders · William Hill · Farron Rucker · Audrey Webb" |
22 | 24 |
|
| 25 | +**Change to:** |
23 | 26 | - Title: **AI-Powered Student Success Analytics** |
24 | 27 | - Subtitle: **Bishop State Community College × CodeBenders** |
25 | | -- Add: "Live at [your-vercel-url]" |
| 28 | +- Below subtitle: `Live at [your-vercel-url]` |
26 | 29 | - Tagline: *Turning PDP data into proactive student interventions* |
| 30 | +- Keep team names |
27 | 31 |
|
28 | 32 | --- |
29 | 33 |
|
30 | | -### Slide: Problem Statement |
| 34 | +### Slide 2 — The Challenge (currently "Three Institutions, One Critical Gap") |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +**Current:** Three-column layout showing University of Akron, Bishop State Community College, and KCTCS as separate institutions with separate pain points. |
31 | 37 |
|
32 | | -Replace with: |
| 38 | +**Replace entirely with:** |
33 | 39 |
|
34 | | -**The Challenge at Bishop State Community College** |
| 40 | +**Title:** The Challenge at Bishop State Community College |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Replace the three-column institution layout with a single focused problem statement for BSCC: |
35 | 43 |
|
36 | 44 | - 59% Black/African American student population — early intervention matters most for this community |
37 | | -- 68% part-time enrollment — students juggling work, family, and school need proactive outreach |
38 | | -- Gateway course bottlenecks in math and English are the #1 predictor of non-retention — but aren't surfaced in existing tools |
39 | | -- Advisors lack unified, predictive views of student risk before academic difficulties compound |
| 45 | +- 68% part-time enrollment — students balancing work, family, and school need proactive outreach |
| 46 | +- Gateway course bottlenecks in math and English are the #1 predictor of non-retention — but not surfaced in existing tools |
| 47 | +- Advisors lack unified, predictive views of student risk before difficulties compound |
40 | 48 | - PDP reporting is manual and annual — no mid-cycle alerting capability |
41 | 49 |
|
| 50 | +Remove all references to Akron and KCTCS from this slide. |
| 51 | + |
42 | 52 | --- |
43 | 53 |
|
44 | | -### Slide: Solution Overview |
| 54 | +### Slide 3 — The Common Thread (currently "Customizable Dashboards / Readiness Assessment / Predictive Analytics") |
45 | 55 |
|
46 | | -**What We Built** |
| 56 | +**Current:** Three generic columns describing what institutions "need." |
47 | 57 |
|
48 | | -A full-stack AI analytics platform with three layers: |
| 58 | +**Replace with:** |
49 | 59 |
|
50 | | -1. **ML Pipeline** — 7 predictive models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students (retention, at-risk, gateway math/English success, GPA risk, time-to-credential, credential type) |
51 | | -2. **Readiness Engine** — PDP-aligned rule-based scoring (academic 40% + engagement 30% + ML risk 30%) with full traceability and human-readable explanations |
52 | | -3. **Live Dashboard** — Natural-language query interface, KPI tiles, retention risk charts, prompt history with re-run and audit trail |
| 60 | +**Title:** What Bishop State Needed — What We Built |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +Convert the three columns to reflect delivered capabilities: |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +| What They Needed | What We Delivered | |
| 65 | +|------------------|-------------------| |
| 66 | +| Quarterly refreshed dashboards with exportable insights | Live dashboard deployed on Vercel — KPI tiles, charts, export to CSV/JSON/Markdown | |
| 67 | +| Student readiness levels before they impact retention | PDP-aligned Readiness Index (Academic 40% + Engagement 30% + ML Risk 30%) scoring all 4,000 students | |
| 68 | +| Predictive models based on historical data | 7 ML models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students (XGBoost + Random Forest + Logistic Regression) | |
53 | 69 |
|
54 | 70 | --- |
55 | 71 |
|
56 | | -### Slide: Architecture / Tech Stack |
| 72 | +### Slide 4 — The Cost of Inaction (22.3% / $10.7B / 39%) |
57 | 73 |
|
58 | | -Update the architecture diagram to reflect: |
| 74 | +**Current:** Three national statistics about dropout rates. |
59 | 75 |
|
60 | | -- **Data Layer:** Bishop State PDP cohort + AR files → Python ML pipeline → Postgres (Supabase, hosted, US East) |
61 | | -- **ML Layer:** XGBoost + Random Forest + Logistic Regression, 7 models, scikit-learn |
62 | | -- **Application Layer:** Next.js 16 + React 19 + TypeScript, deployed on Vercel |
63 | | -- **AI Features:** OpenAI-powered NLQ → SQL → Recharts visualizations |
64 | | -- **Audit:** Server-side JSONL query log, prompt history in localStorage |
| 76 | +**Keep the national statistics** (they are still valid). Add one callout below the stats: |
65 | 77 |
|
66 | | -Stack badges: Python · XGBoost · scikit-learn · Next.js · Supabase · Vercel · OpenAI |
| 78 | +> *At Bishop State, 68% of students enroll part-time — the demographic most impacted by these national trends and the most responsive to early intervention.* |
67 | 79 |
|
68 | 80 | --- |
69 | 81 |
|
70 | | -### Slide: The 7 Predictive Models |
| 82 | +### Slide 5 — Our Solution (NLQ / Visualizations / Predictive Models / Export & Share) |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +**Current:** Four numbered points describing the solution generically. |
71 | 85 |
|
72 | | -| Model | Output | Algorithm | |
73 | | -|-------|--------|-----------| |
74 | | -| Retention Prediction | Probability + risk tier | Logistic Regression | |
75 | | -| At-Risk Early Warning | URGENT / HIGH / MODERATE / LOW | Composite rule engine | |
76 | | -| Gateway Math Success | Pass probability | XGBoost | |
77 | | -| Gateway English Success | Pass probability | XGBoost | |
78 | | -| First-Semester GPA Risk | Low GPA probability | XGBoost | |
79 | | -| Time-to-Credential | Predicted years to completion | Random Forest Regressor | |
80 | | -| Credential Type | Associate / Certificate / Bachelor | Random Forest Classifier | |
| 86 | +**Update each point:** |
81 | 87 |
|
82 | | -Trained on 4,000 Bishop State students with cross-validation and overfitting checks. |
| 88 | +1. **Natural Language Queries** — Type questions in plain English. Our OpenAI-powered interface translates them into SQL and returns a chart + raw data table instantly. No technical expertise required. |
| 89 | +2. **Instant Visualizations** — Bar, line, and pie charts generated on-demand from the `student_level_with_predictions` view. All charts include a raw data table for verification. |
| 90 | +3. **Predictive Models** — 7 ML models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students covering retention, at-risk alerting, gateway math and English success, GPA risk, time-to-credential, and credential type. |
| 91 | +4. **Export & Share** — Download the full dashboard as CSV, JSON, or Markdown report with one click. |
83 | 92 |
|
84 | 93 | --- |
85 | 94 |
|
86 | | -### Slide: Readiness Score |
| 95 | +### Slide 6 — Predictive Analytics Models (currently "6 ML Models Working Together") |
87 | 96 |
|
88 | | -**PDP-Aligned Readiness Index** |
| 97 | +**Current:** Title says "6 ML Models." Lists: Retention Prediction, At-Risk Warning System, Time to Credential, Credential Type Prediction, Course Success/GPA Prediction, Gateway Math & English Success Prediction (combined). |
89 | 98 |
|
90 | | -Formula: |
91 | | -> Readiness = (Academic × 40%) + (Engagement × 30%) + (ML Risk × 30%) |
| 99 | +**Change title to:** **7 ML Models Working Together to Predict Student Success** |
92 | 100 |
|
93 | | -Tiers: 🟢 High ≥ 0.65 · 🟡 Medium 0.40–0.64 · 🔴 Low < 0.40 |
| 101 | +**Replace the model list with:** |
94 | 102 |
|
95 | | -Current Bishop State distribution: |
96 | | -- High Readiness: 83.9% (3,355 students) |
97 | | -- Medium Readiness: 16.1% (645 students) |
| 103 | +| # | Model | Output | Algorithm | |
| 104 | +|---|-------|--------|-----------| |
| 105 | +| 1 | Retention Prediction | Probability + risk tier | Logistic Regression | |
| 106 | +| 2 | At-Risk Early Warning | URGENT / HIGH / MODERATE / LOW | Composite rule engine | |
| 107 | +| 3 | Gateway Math Success | Pass probability | XGBoost | |
| 108 | +| 4 | Gateway English Success | Pass probability | XGBoost | |
| 109 | +| 5 | First-Semester GPA Risk | Low GPA probability | XGBoost | |
| 110 | +| 6 | Time-to-Credential | Predicted years to completion | Random Forest Regressor | |
| 111 | +| 7 | Credential Type | Associate / Certificate / Bachelor | Random Forest Classifier | |
98 | 112 |
|
99 | | -Grounded in: PDP momentum metrics, CCRC Multiple Measures research, Bird et al. (2021) transparency in predictive analytics. |
| 113 | +**Update the Key Model Insights** bullet: |
| 114 | +- Remove "23 features" — replace with "31 features across demographics, academic prep, enrollment, course performance, and Year 1 outcomes" |
| 115 | +- Keep the academic placement levels insight |
| 116 | +- Add: "All 7 models trained with cross-validation and overfitting checks on 4,000 Bishop State students" |
100 | 117 |
|
101 | | -Every score is fully traceable — no black box. |
| 118 | +**Remove the "Implementation Timeline"** section — it describes a future plan; the models are already running. |
102 | 119 |
|
103 | 120 | --- |
104 | 121 |
|
105 | | -### Slide: Dashboard Features |
| 122 | +### Slide 7 — Solution Architecture |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +**Current:** Abstract flow diagram: "PDP Cohort, PDP Course, AR Data → ML Models (5 Predictive Models) → Processing Pipeline → Storage & API → Frontend Dashboard" |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +**Update to reflect the actual stack:** |
106 | 127 |
|
107 | | -**What Advisors & Leadership See** |
| 128 | +Flow (left to right): **Data → ML Pipeline → Database → API → Dashboard** |
108 | 129 |
|
109 | | -- **KPI Tiles:** Overall retention rate, at-risk student count, average readiness score |
110 | | -- **Charts:** Retention risk distribution, readiness breakdown, at-risk alert levels |
111 | | -- **NLQ Query Interface:** Type a question in plain English → get a chart + data table |
112 | | -- **Prompt History:** Every query logged with timestamp, re-runnable in one click |
113 | | -- **Methodology Page:** Research citations, scoring formula, worked examples (Maria T. → 0.699 High; Jordan M. → 0.386 Low) |
| 130 | +- **Data:** Bishop State PDP cohort + AR files (4,000 students) |
| 131 | +- **ML Pipeline:** Python · XGBoost · Random Forest · Logistic Regression · scikit-learn — 7 models |
| 132 | +- **Database:** Postgres (Supabase, hosted, US East) — `student_level_with_predictions` view |
| 133 | +- **API:** Next.js 16 API routes (serverless, Vercel) — `/api/dashboard/kpis`, `/api/analyze`, `/api/execute-sql` |
| 134 | +- **Dashboard:** React 19 + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS + Recharts — deployed on Vercel |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +Add stack badges below the diagram: `Python · XGBoost · scikit-learn · Next.js 16 · React 19 · Supabase · Vercel · OpenAI` |
114 | 137 |
|
115 | 138 | --- |
116 | 139 |
|
117 | | -### Slide: FERPA & Transparency |
| 140 | +### Slide 8 — How It Works (Connect / Ask / Get Insights) |
118 | 141 |
|
119 | | -**Built for Institutional Trust** |
| 142 | +**Current:** Three steps described generically ("Connect Your Data / Ask Questions / Get Insights"). |
120 | 143 |
|
121 | | -- No PII transmitted to any LLM provider — only aggregate behavioral metrics (GPA group, completion rate, placement level) |
122 | | -- Student GUIDs excluded from stored features |
123 | | -- Every readiness score traceable to its inputs |
124 | | -- Server-side audit log of all NLQ queries (JSONL) |
125 | | -- Methodology page publicly accessible for advisor onboarding |
| 144 | +**Update step descriptions:** |
126 | 145 |
|
127 | | -Complies with FERPA §99.31(a)(1) for legitimate educational interest use. |
| 146 | +1. **Connect Your Data** — Bishop State's PDP cohort and AR files feed a Python ML pipeline. 7 models score every student and upsert results to Supabase with zero duplicates on re-run. |
| 147 | +2. **Ask Questions** — Type natural language queries like *"Show retention rate by credential type"* or *"How many students are at urgent risk?"*. OpenAI translates them to SQL in real time. |
| 148 | +3. **Get Insights** — Receive instant bar, line, or pie charts plus a raw data table. Every query is logged to localStorage and a server-side JSONL audit trail for FERPA compliance. |
128 | 149 |
|
129 | 150 | --- |
130 | 151 |
|
131 | | -### Slide: Results & Impact |
| 152 | +### Slide 9 — Live Demo |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +**Current:** Just a title slide ("Live Demo"). |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +**Replace with:** |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +**Title:** Live Platform |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +Add content: |
| 161 | +- URL: `[your-vercel-url]` (bold, large text) |
| 162 | +- Three callout cards: |
| 163 | + 1. **KPI Dashboard** — Retention rate, at-risk count, readiness score, completion rate — all live from Supabase |
| 164 | + 2. **NLQ Query Interface** — Type any question, get a chart + data table in seconds |
| 165 | + 3. **Methodology Page** — Full scoring formula, research citations, worked examples (Maria T. → High 0.699; Jordan M. → Low 0.386) |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +--- |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +### Slide 10 — Measurable Return on Investment |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +**Current:** Four rows: Early Intervention, Increased Retention, Resource Advocacy, Leadership Engagement. |
132 | 172 |
|
133 | | -**Delivered for Bishop State** |
| 173 | +**Keep structure. Update text:** |
134 | 174 |
|
| 175 | +- **Early Intervention** — 4,000 Bishop State students are now scored daily across 7 risk dimensions. Advisors can identify URGENT-risk students before they drop. |
| 176 | +- **Increased Retention** — Data-driven interventions targeting the 83.9% High Readiness vs. 16.1% Medium Readiness populations enable earlier, more effective outreach. |
| 177 | +- **Resource Advocacy** — The Readiness Index is grounded in CCRC Multiple Measures research and Bird et al. (2021) — citations that strengthen grant applications. |
| 178 | +- **Leadership Engagement** — Exportable CSV/JSON/Markdown reports and a live dashboard give leadership presentation-ready data at any time. |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +--- |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +### Slide 11 — Real-World Impact Scenarios (For Advisors / For Leadership) |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +**Current:** Two columns with generic bullet points. |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +**Update bullets:** |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +**For Advisors:** |
| 189 | +- Readiness scores + at-risk alert levels (URGENT/HIGH/MODERATE/LOW) prioritize which students to contact first |
| 190 | +- Gateway math and English success predictions identify students who need support *before* they fail the course |
| 191 | +- Natural-language query interface — no SQL needed to pull custom cohort reports |
| 192 | +- Prompt history lets advisors re-run any past query in one click |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +**For Leadership:** |
| 195 | +- KPI dashboard shows overall retention rate, at-risk count, average readiness score, and course completion rate at a glance |
| 196 | +- 7-model prediction suite covers every major student outcome metric required for PDP reporting |
| 197 | +- Methodology page documents every formula and research citation — ready for accreditation or grant review |
| 198 | +- Full audit trail of all queries for FERPA compliance review |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +--- |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | +### Slide 12 — Your Next Steps (currently "Customize / Engage / Pilot and Scale") |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +**Current:** Describes onboarding steps for a *prospective* institution. |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +**Replace entirely with:** |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +**Title:** What's Live — What's Next |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +**Delivered (checkmarks):** |
135 | 211 | - ✅ 4,000 students scored across 7 prediction dimensions |
136 | | -- ✅ Live dashboard deployed (Vercel + Supabase) |
137 | | -- ✅ NLQ interface with prompt history and audit trail |
| 212 | +- ✅ Live dashboard deployed (Vercel + Supabase, US East) |
| 213 | +- ✅ NLQ interface with prompt history and server-side audit trail |
138 | 214 | - ✅ PDP-aligned readiness engine with research citations |
139 | 215 | - ✅ Methodology page with worked examples for advisor transparency |
140 | | -- ✅ Deploy script for ongoing data refresh |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +**Roadmap:** |
| 218 | +- 🔲 Role-based access (Advisor / Leadership / IR views) |
| 219 | +- 🔲 GitHub Actions for automated deploy on `main` push |
| 220 | +- 🔲 Multi-institution onboarding (University of Akron, KCTCS) |
| 221 | +- 🔲 Student roster table with per-student drill-down |
| 222 | +- 🔲 Dashboard filtering by cohort, term, and demographic attributes |
141 | 223 |
|
142 | 224 | --- |
143 | 225 |
|
144 | | -### Slide: Next Steps / Roadmap |
| 226 | +### Slide 13 — Closing ("Let's Transform Student Success Together") |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +**Current:** Generic closing slide with tagline "The question isn't whether we can predict student success. The question is: what will we do with that knowledge?" |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +**Keep the tagline.** Update the body: |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +> We built a live, deployed AI analytics platform for Bishop State Community College — 4,000 students scored, 7 models running, advisors empowered. The platform is live today at `[your-vercel-url]`. |
145 | 233 |
|
146 | | -- **CI/CD:** GitHub Actions for automated Vercel deploy on `main` push |
147 | | -- **Multi-institution:** Onboard University of Akron and KCTCS using the same PDP-aligned pipeline |
148 | | -- **Role-based access:** Advisor vs. Leadership vs. IR views |
149 | | -- **Scheduled refresh:** Quarterly PDP pipeline re-runs |
150 | | -- **Enhanced NLQ:** Demographic equity gap queries, cohort comparison |
| 234 | +Add callout cards for three key numbers: |
| 235 | +- **4,000** students scored |
| 236 | +- **7** predictive models |
| 237 | +- **83.9%** High Readiness |
151 | 238 |
|
152 | 239 | --- |
153 | 240 |
|
154 | | -### Design Notes for Gamma |
| 241 | +## Design Notes |
155 | 242 |
|
156 | 243 | - Keep the existing color scheme and layout style |
157 | | -- Use data callout cards for the key numbers (4,000 students, 7 models, 83.9% High Readiness) |
158 | | -- The architecture slide should use a left-to-right flow diagram: Data → ML Pipeline → Supabase → Next.js/Vercel → User |
159 | | -- The readiness score slide should visually show the three weighted components adding up to the final score |
160 | | -- Add Bishop State's colors (navy and gold) as accent colors where appropriate |
| 244 | +- Add Bishop State navy and gold as accent colors on data callout cards |
| 245 | +- The architecture slide (Slide 7) should use a left-to-right flow diagram |
| 246 | +- The readiness score content (Slide 3) should visually show the three weighted components (40% + 30% + 30%) summing to the final score |
| 247 | +- Use data callout cards for the key numbers: 4,000 students, 7 models, 83.9% High Readiness |
0 commit comments