Skip to content

Commit 31ce6bb

Browse files
committed
docs: rewrite Gamma prompt with slide-by-slide instructions based on actual deck content
1 parent 83aae90 commit 31ce6bb

1 file changed

Lines changed: 168 additions & 81 deletions

File tree

docs/gamma-update-prompt.md

Lines changed: 168 additions & 81 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,160 +1,247 @@
11
# Gamma.app Slide Deck Update Prompt
22

33
Paste the prompt below into Gamma.app to update the **AI-Powered Student Success Analytics** slide deck.
4+
The current deck has 13 slides. This prompt tells you exactly what to change on each slide.
45

56
---
67

7-
## Prompt
8+
## Overall Framing
89

9-
Update the existing "AI-Powered Student Success Analytics" slide deck for the CodeBenders Datathon submission. The platform has been fully built and deployed. Replace any draft/planned framing with current, delivered-state language. Apply the following changes slide by slide, then ensure visual consistency throughout.
10+
- The platform is **live and deployed** for **Bishop State Community College (BSCC)**, a historically Black community college in Mobile, Alabama (~4,000 students/year). It is **not** a multi-institution prototype.
11+
- Remove University of Akron and KCTCS as co-equal institutions. They may appear only as "future institution onboarding" examples.
12+
- Replace all "will build / planned / customize for your context" language with "built / delivered / live."
13+
- Add Bishop State's colors (navy and gold) as accent colors where appropriate.
1014

1115
---
1216

13-
### Overall Framing Changes
14-
15-
- The platform is no longer described as a multi-institution prototype. It is a **live, deployed system built for Bishop State Community College (BSCC)**, a historically Black community college in Mobile, Alabama (~4,000 students/year). It is designed to extend to other PDP institutions.
16-
- Remove or de-emphasize KCTCS as a co-equal institution. References to University of Akron and KCTCS can appear as "future institution onboarding" examples only.
17-
- Replace any "we will build" or "planned" language with "we built" and "delivered."
17+
## Slide-by-Slide Instructions
1818

1919
---
2020

21-
### Slide: Title / Cover
21+
### Slide 1 — Title / Cover
22+
23+
**Current:** "AI-Powered Student Success Analytics · Transforming higher education data into actionable insights that improve student readiness, retention, and institutional outcomes · Team CodeBenders · William Hill · Farron Rucker · Audrey Webb"
2224

25+
**Change to:**
2326
- Title: **AI-Powered Student Success Analytics**
2427
- Subtitle: **Bishop State Community College × CodeBenders**
25-
- Add: "Live at [your-vercel-url]"
28+
- Below subtitle: `Live at [your-vercel-url]`
2629
- Tagline: *Turning PDP data into proactive student interventions*
30+
- Keep team names
2731

2832
---
2933

30-
### Slide: Problem Statement
34+
### Slide 2 — The Challenge (currently "Three Institutions, One Critical Gap")
35+
36+
**Current:** Three-column layout showing University of Akron, Bishop State Community College, and KCTCS as separate institutions with separate pain points.
3137

32-
Replace with:
38+
**Replace entirely with:**
3339

34-
**The Challenge at Bishop State Community College**
40+
**Title:** The Challenge at Bishop State Community College
41+
42+
Replace the three-column institution layout with a single focused problem statement for BSCC:
3543

3644
- 59% Black/African American student population — early intervention matters most for this community
37-
- 68% part-time enrollment — students juggling work, family, and school need proactive outreach
38-
- Gateway course bottlenecks in math and English are the #1 predictor of non-retention — but aren't surfaced in existing tools
39-
- Advisors lack unified, predictive views of student risk before academic difficulties compound
45+
- 68% part-time enrollment — students balancing work, family, and school need proactive outreach
46+
- Gateway course bottlenecks in math and English are the #1 predictor of non-retention — but not surfaced in existing tools
47+
- Advisors lack unified, predictive views of student risk before difficulties compound
4048
- PDP reporting is manual and annual — no mid-cycle alerting capability
4149

50+
Remove all references to Akron and KCTCS from this slide.
51+
4252
---
4353

44-
### Slide: Solution Overview
54+
### Slide 3 — The Common Thread (currently "Customizable Dashboards / Readiness Assessment / Predictive Analytics")
4555

46-
**What We Built**
56+
**Current:** Three generic columns describing what institutions "need."
4757

48-
A full-stack AI analytics platform with three layers:
58+
**Replace with:**
4959

50-
1. **ML Pipeline** — 7 predictive models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students (retention, at-risk, gateway math/English success, GPA risk, time-to-credential, credential type)
51-
2. **Readiness Engine** — PDP-aligned rule-based scoring (academic 40% + engagement 30% + ML risk 30%) with full traceability and human-readable explanations
52-
3. **Live Dashboard** — Natural-language query interface, KPI tiles, retention risk charts, prompt history with re-run and audit trail
60+
**Title:** What Bishop State Needed — What We Built
61+
62+
Convert the three columns to reflect delivered capabilities:
63+
64+
| What They Needed | What We Delivered |
65+
|------------------|-------------------|
66+
| Quarterly refreshed dashboards with exportable insights | Live dashboard deployed on Vercel — KPI tiles, charts, export to CSV/JSON/Markdown |
67+
| Student readiness levels before they impact retention | PDP-aligned Readiness Index (Academic 40% + Engagement 30% + ML Risk 30%) scoring all 4,000 students |
68+
| Predictive models based on historical data | 7 ML models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students (XGBoost + Random Forest + Logistic Regression) |
5369

5470
---
5571

56-
### Slide: Architecture / Tech Stack
72+
### Slide 4 — The Cost of Inaction (22.3% / $10.7B / 39%)
5773

58-
Update the architecture diagram to reflect:
74+
**Current:** Three national statistics about dropout rates.
5975

60-
- **Data Layer:** Bishop State PDP cohort + AR files → Python ML pipeline → Postgres (Supabase, hosted, US East)
61-
- **ML Layer:** XGBoost + Random Forest + Logistic Regression, 7 models, scikit-learn
62-
- **Application Layer:** Next.js 16 + React 19 + TypeScript, deployed on Vercel
63-
- **AI Features:** OpenAI-powered NLQ → SQL → Recharts visualizations
64-
- **Audit:** Server-side JSONL query log, prompt history in localStorage
76+
**Keep the national statistics** (they are still valid). Add one callout below the stats:
6577

66-
Stack badges: Python · XGBoost · scikit-learn · Next.js · Supabase · Vercel · OpenAI
78+
> *At Bishop State, 68% of students enroll part-time — the demographic most impacted by these national trends and the most responsive to early intervention.*
6779
6880
---
6981

70-
### Slide: The 7 Predictive Models
82+
### Slide 5 — Our Solution (NLQ / Visualizations / Predictive Models / Export & Share)
83+
84+
**Current:** Four numbered points describing the solution generically.
7185

72-
| Model | Output | Algorithm |
73-
|-------|--------|-----------|
74-
| Retention Prediction | Probability + risk tier | Logistic Regression |
75-
| At-Risk Early Warning | URGENT / HIGH / MODERATE / LOW | Composite rule engine |
76-
| Gateway Math Success | Pass probability | XGBoost |
77-
| Gateway English Success | Pass probability | XGBoost |
78-
| First-Semester GPA Risk | Low GPA probability | XGBoost |
79-
| Time-to-Credential | Predicted years to completion | Random Forest Regressor |
80-
| Credential Type | Associate / Certificate / Bachelor | Random Forest Classifier |
86+
**Update each point:**
8187

82-
Trained on 4,000 Bishop State students with cross-validation and overfitting checks.
88+
1. **Natural Language Queries** — Type questions in plain English. Our OpenAI-powered interface translates them into SQL and returns a chart + raw data table instantly. No technical expertise required.
89+
2. **Instant Visualizations** — Bar, line, and pie charts generated on-demand from the `student_level_with_predictions` view. All charts include a raw data table for verification.
90+
3. **Predictive Models** — 7 ML models trained on 4,000 Bishop State students covering retention, at-risk alerting, gateway math and English success, GPA risk, time-to-credential, and credential type.
91+
4. **Export & Share** — Download the full dashboard as CSV, JSON, or Markdown report with one click.
8392

8493
---
8594

86-
### Slide: Readiness Score
95+
### Slide 6 — Predictive Analytics Models (currently "6 ML Models Working Together")
8796

88-
**PDP-Aligned Readiness Index**
97+
**Current:** Title says "6 ML Models." Lists: Retention Prediction, At-Risk Warning System, Time to Credential, Credential Type Prediction, Course Success/GPA Prediction, Gateway Math & English Success Prediction (combined).
8998

90-
Formula:
91-
> Readiness = (Academic × 40%) + (Engagement × 30%) + (ML Risk × 30%)
99+
**Change title to:** **7 ML Models Working Together to Predict Student Success**
92100

93-
Tiers: 🟢 High ≥ 0.65 · 🟡 Medium 0.40–0.64 · 🔴 Low < 0.40
101+
**Replace the model list with:**
94102

95-
Current Bishop State distribution:
96-
- High Readiness: 83.9% (3,355 students)
97-
- Medium Readiness: 16.1% (645 students)
103+
| # | Model | Output | Algorithm |
104+
|---|-------|--------|-----------|
105+
| 1 | Retention Prediction | Probability + risk tier | Logistic Regression |
106+
| 2 | At-Risk Early Warning | URGENT / HIGH / MODERATE / LOW | Composite rule engine |
107+
| 3 | Gateway Math Success | Pass probability | XGBoost |
108+
| 4 | Gateway English Success | Pass probability | XGBoost |
109+
| 5 | First-Semester GPA Risk | Low GPA probability | XGBoost |
110+
| 6 | Time-to-Credential | Predicted years to completion | Random Forest Regressor |
111+
| 7 | Credential Type | Associate / Certificate / Bachelor | Random Forest Classifier |
98112

99-
Grounded in: PDP momentum metrics, CCRC Multiple Measures research, Bird et al. (2021) transparency in predictive analytics.
113+
**Update the Key Model Insights** bullet:
114+
- Remove "23 features" — replace with "31 features across demographics, academic prep, enrollment, course performance, and Year 1 outcomes"
115+
- Keep the academic placement levels insight
116+
- Add: "All 7 models trained with cross-validation and overfitting checks on 4,000 Bishop State students"
100117

101-
Every score is fully traceableno black box.
118+
**Remove the "Implementation Timeline"** sectionit describes a future plan; the models are already running.
102119

103120
---
104121

105-
### Slide: Dashboard Features
122+
### Slide 7 — Solution Architecture
123+
124+
**Current:** Abstract flow diagram: "PDP Cohort, PDP Course, AR Data → ML Models (5 Predictive Models) → Processing Pipeline → Storage & API → Frontend Dashboard"
125+
126+
**Update to reflect the actual stack:**
106127

107-
**What Advisors & Leadership See**
128+
Flow (left to right): **Data → ML Pipeline → Database → API → Dashboard**
108129

109-
- **KPI Tiles:** Overall retention rate, at-risk student count, average readiness score
110-
- **Charts:** Retention risk distribution, readiness breakdown, at-risk alert levels
111-
- **NLQ Query Interface:** Type a question in plain English → get a chart + data table
112-
- **Prompt History:** Every query logged with timestamp, re-runnable in one click
113-
- **Methodology Page:** Research citations, scoring formula, worked examples (Maria T. → 0.699 High; Jordan M. → 0.386 Low)
130+
- **Data:** Bishop State PDP cohort + AR files (4,000 students)
131+
- **ML Pipeline:** Python · XGBoost · Random Forest · Logistic Regression · scikit-learn — 7 models
132+
- **Database:** Postgres (Supabase, hosted, US East) — `student_level_with_predictions` view
133+
- **API:** Next.js 16 API routes (serverless, Vercel) — `/api/dashboard/kpis`, `/api/analyze`, `/api/execute-sql`
134+
- **Dashboard:** React 19 + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS + Recharts — deployed on Vercel
135+
136+
Add stack badges below the diagram: `Python · XGBoost · scikit-learn · Next.js 16 · React 19 · Supabase · Vercel · OpenAI`
114137

115138
---
116139

117-
### Slide: FERPA & Transparency
140+
### Slide 8 — How It Works (Connect / Ask / Get Insights)
118141

119-
**Built for Institutional Trust**
142+
**Current:** Three steps described generically ("Connect Your Data / Ask Questions / Get Insights").
120143

121-
- No PII transmitted to any LLM provider — only aggregate behavioral metrics (GPA group, completion rate, placement level)
122-
- Student GUIDs excluded from stored features
123-
- Every readiness score traceable to its inputs
124-
- Server-side audit log of all NLQ queries (JSONL)
125-
- Methodology page publicly accessible for advisor onboarding
144+
**Update step descriptions:**
126145

127-
Complies with FERPA §99.31(a)(1) for legitimate educational interest use.
146+
1. **Connect Your Data** — Bishop State's PDP cohort and AR files feed a Python ML pipeline. 7 models score every student and upsert results to Supabase with zero duplicates on re-run.
147+
2. **Ask Questions** — Type natural language queries like *"Show retention rate by credential type"* or *"How many students are at urgent risk?"*. OpenAI translates them to SQL in real time.
148+
3. **Get Insights** — Receive instant bar, line, or pie charts plus a raw data table. Every query is logged to localStorage and a server-side JSONL audit trail for FERPA compliance.
128149

129150
---
130151

131-
### Slide: Results & Impact
152+
### Slide 9 — Live Demo
153+
154+
**Current:** Just a title slide ("Live Demo").
155+
156+
**Replace with:**
157+
158+
**Title:** Live Platform
159+
160+
Add content:
161+
- URL: `[your-vercel-url]` (bold, large text)
162+
- Three callout cards:
163+
1. **KPI Dashboard** — Retention rate, at-risk count, readiness score, completion rate — all live from Supabase
164+
2. **NLQ Query Interface** — Type any question, get a chart + data table in seconds
165+
3. **Methodology Page** — Full scoring formula, research citations, worked examples (Maria T. → High 0.699; Jordan M. → Low 0.386)
166+
167+
---
168+
169+
### Slide 10 — Measurable Return on Investment
170+
171+
**Current:** Four rows: Early Intervention, Increased Retention, Resource Advocacy, Leadership Engagement.
132172

133-
**Delivered for Bishop State**
173+
**Keep structure. Update text:**
134174

175+
- **Early Intervention** — 4,000 Bishop State students are now scored daily across 7 risk dimensions. Advisors can identify URGENT-risk students before they drop.
176+
- **Increased Retention** — Data-driven interventions targeting the 83.9% High Readiness vs. 16.1% Medium Readiness populations enable earlier, more effective outreach.
177+
- **Resource Advocacy** — The Readiness Index is grounded in CCRC Multiple Measures research and Bird et al. (2021) — citations that strengthen grant applications.
178+
- **Leadership Engagement** — Exportable CSV/JSON/Markdown reports and a live dashboard give leadership presentation-ready data at any time.
179+
180+
---
181+
182+
### Slide 11 — Real-World Impact Scenarios (For Advisors / For Leadership)
183+
184+
**Current:** Two columns with generic bullet points.
185+
186+
**Update bullets:**
187+
188+
**For Advisors:**
189+
- Readiness scores + at-risk alert levels (URGENT/HIGH/MODERATE/LOW) prioritize which students to contact first
190+
- Gateway math and English success predictions identify students who need support *before* they fail the course
191+
- Natural-language query interface — no SQL needed to pull custom cohort reports
192+
- Prompt history lets advisors re-run any past query in one click
193+
194+
**For Leadership:**
195+
- KPI dashboard shows overall retention rate, at-risk count, average readiness score, and course completion rate at a glance
196+
- 7-model prediction suite covers every major student outcome metric required for PDP reporting
197+
- Methodology page documents every formula and research citation — ready for accreditation or grant review
198+
- Full audit trail of all queries for FERPA compliance review
199+
200+
---
201+
202+
### Slide 12 — Your Next Steps (currently "Customize / Engage / Pilot and Scale")
203+
204+
**Current:** Describes onboarding steps for a *prospective* institution.
205+
206+
**Replace entirely with:**
207+
208+
**Title:** What's Live — What's Next
209+
210+
**Delivered (checkmarks):**
135211
- ✅ 4,000 students scored across 7 prediction dimensions
136-
- ✅ Live dashboard deployed (Vercel + Supabase)
137-
- ✅ NLQ interface with prompt history and audit trail
212+
- ✅ Live dashboard deployed (Vercel + Supabase, US East)
213+
- ✅ NLQ interface with prompt history and server-side audit trail
138214
- ✅ PDP-aligned readiness engine with research citations
139215
- ✅ Methodology page with worked examples for advisor transparency
140-
- ✅ Deploy script for ongoing data refresh
216+
217+
**Roadmap:**
218+
- 🔲 Role-based access (Advisor / Leadership / IR views)
219+
- 🔲 GitHub Actions for automated deploy on `main` push
220+
- 🔲 Multi-institution onboarding (University of Akron, KCTCS)
221+
- 🔲 Student roster table with per-student drill-down
222+
- 🔲 Dashboard filtering by cohort, term, and demographic attributes
141223

142224
---
143225

144-
### Slide: Next Steps / Roadmap
226+
### Slide 13 — Closing ("Let's Transform Student Success Together")
227+
228+
**Current:** Generic closing slide with tagline "The question isn't whether we can predict student success. The question is: what will we do with that knowledge?"
229+
230+
**Keep the tagline.** Update the body:
231+
232+
> We built a live, deployed AI analytics platform for Bishop State Community College — 4,000 students scored, 7 models running, advisors empowered. The platform is live today at `[your-vercel-url]`.
145233
146-
- **CI/CD:** GitHub Actions for automated Vercel deploy on `main` push
147-
- **Multi-institution:** Onboard University of Akron and KCTCS using the same PDP-aligned pipeline
148-
- **Role-based access:** Advisor vs. Leadership vs. IR views
149-
- **Scheduled refresh:** Quarterly PDP pipeline re-runs
150-
- **Enhanced NLQ:** Demographic equity gap queries, cohort comparison
234+
Add callout cards for three key numbers:
235+
- **4,000** students scored
236+
- **7** predictive models
237+
- **83.9%** High Readiness
151238

152239
---
153240

154-
### Design Notes for Gamma
241+
## Design Notes
155242

156243
- Keep the existing color scheme and layout style
157-
- Use data callout cards for the key numbers (4,000 students, 7 models, 83.9% High Readiness)
158-
- The architecture slide should use a left-to-right flow diagram: Data → ML Pipeline → Supabase → Next.js/Vercel → User
159-
- The readiness score slide should visually show the three weighted components adding up to the final score
160-
- Add Bishop State's colors (navy and gold) as accent colors where appropriate
244+
- Add Bishop State navy and gold as accent colors on data callout cards
245+
- The architecture slide (Slide 7) should use a left-to-right flow diagram
246+
- The readiness score content (Slide 3) should visually show the three weighted components (40% + 30% + 30%) summing to the final score
247+
- Use data callout cards for the key numbers: 4,000 students, 7 models, 83.9% High Readiness

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)