Skip to content

All topics in root / namespace, difficult for multirobot environment #276

Description

@ivan140

Hi,

In the package fiducial_slam there are several subscribers and publishers which use the root (/) namespace. Here are the mentioned lines:

FiducialSlam::FiducialSlam(ros::NodeHandle &nh) : fiducialMap(nh) {
...
ft_sub = nh.subscribe("/fiducial_transforms", 1, &FiducialSlam::transformCallback, this);
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Map::Map(ros::NodeHandle &nh) : tfBuffer(ros::Duration(30.0)) {
...
robotPosePub =
    ros::Publisher(nh.advertise<geometry_msgs::PoseWithCovarianceStamped>("/fiducial_pose", 1));
cameraPosePub = ros::Publisher(
    nh.advertise<geometry_msgs::PoseWithCovarianceStamped>("/fiducial_slam/camera_pose", 1));

markerPub = ros::Publisher(nh.advertise<visualization_msgs::Marker>("/fiducials", 100));
mapPub = ros::Publisher(nh.advertise<fiducial_msgs::FiducialMapEntryArray>("/fiducial_map", 1));

When having several robots, each in its own namespace it makes it difficult to manage the fiducial_slam (remap...). I'd make a pull request with a fix, but want to ask you how you'd prefer it:

  1. Pass two NodeHandles (pnh and nh) to these functions. This way, if a namespace is defined and you declare the subscriber with nh but without the / the nodehandle will use the namespace: /robot_1/fiducial_map
  2. Pass only the private NodeHandle, as it is now, but create all publishers from the private namespace, which will result in: /robot_1/fiducial_slam/fiducial_map

What is the preferable way in your opinion?
Thank you in advance.
Ivan

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions