I think we found a typo here:
|
individual action :>> fuelConsumption : FuelEconomyAnalysis_1 { |
The example declares an individual action def for the fuel-consumption analysis action (line 77), but the redefinition it was written for is typed with the analysis individual instead (line 86):
action fuelConsumption : FuelConsumption { ... } // line 59
individual analysis def FuelEconomyAnalysis_1 :> FuelEconomyAnalysis; // line 76
individual action def FuelConsumption_1 :> FuelConsumption; // line 77
individual analysis fuelEconomyAnalysis_1 : FuelEconomyAnalysis_1 {
...
individual action :>> fuelConsumption : FuelEconomyAnalysis_1 { // line 86
...
}
}
I think we found a typo here:
SysML-v2-Release/sysml/src/examples/Individuals Examples/AnalysisIndividualExample.sysml
Line 86 in 288d129
The example declares an individual action def for the fuel-consumption analysis action (line 77), but the redefinition it was written for is typed with the analysis individual instead (line 86):