User problem
I want to run online RL on DeepSeek-V4 (V4-Flash first, V4-Pro later) with Molt, using its agentic Env/ChatAgent reward path. I'm coming to this with two pieces of directly relevant prior experience:
- DeepSeek-V4 Flash/Pro SFT on NVIDIA AutoModel - got it working, but it needed modifications. AutoModel was not turnkey for V4: I had to work around mixed-precision (fp8) issues and the chat-template gap (V4 ships no HF tokenizer.chat_template - formatting is done by a Python encoder, encoding/encoding_dsv4.py::encode_messages, not Jinja). Since Molt's training backend is AutoModel + FSDP2, I expect the same two issues to resurface on the RL path unless they're handled explicitly.
- DeepSeek-V4 GRPO on verl - ran into a long tail of environment pitfalls, most driven by our cluster constraints: driver 570.124.06 with a CUDA 12.8 ceiling. The single hardest wall was structural: DeepSeek-V4 is only recognized by vLLM's ModelRegistry from ≥0.20.0, but every PyPI vLLM wheel ≥0.20.0 links CUDA 13 and fails CUDA init against a 570.x driver - I only got past it by source-building vLLM 0.22.1 against CUDA 12.2. On top of that: transformers ≥5.8.0 needed for deepseek_v4, TransformerEngine requiring CUDA <13.0, FlashMLA nv_dev needing nvcc ≥12.9, Megatron-core API drift, and a series of multi-node-only failures (Ray GCS registration timeouts, PYTHONPATH not reaching non-head actors, hardcoded Ray port collisions on a shared cluster, etc.) that were invisible to single-node dry-runs.
Given all that, my core ask is not just "does Molt plan to support V4 RL" - it's whether Molt can offer a more user-friendly, batteries-included recipe than what I had to assemble by hand on verl. Concretely, a V4 RL recipe that ships:
- A one-command environment setup script that resolves the known version/toolchain triangle end-to-end (transformers / vLLM / TransformerEngine / FlashMLA / cuDNN-frontend / Megatron-core), with a documented, driver-aware path for clusters stuck below CUDA 13 (e.g. a source-build option for the rollout engine) - so users don't rediscover the 570.x-driver wall the hard way.
- A ready training config for V4-Flash (and Pro) that already encodes the hard architecture constraints - TP=1, PP×EP×CP mesh, MTP-on-last-stage, fp8/mixed-precision settings, and the chat-template injection - so it works without per-user patching.
- Multi-node launch scripts for the common cluster shapes - a SLURM sbatch script and a bare-metal multi-node Ray bring-up script — that handle the operational details that only bite at scale (network/IB interface detection, staggered Ray head/worker startup with a registration gate, non-default port selection on shared clusters, PYTHONPATH/env propagation to remote actors).
Desired outcome
A stated plan (and ideally a validated reference recipe) covering:
- Model path decision
- Precision story
- A user-friendly V4-Flash RL recipe delivering the three items above
- A supported vLLM build matrix
- Agentic-path confirmation
Affected area
area:llm
Extra context
Affected areas in Molt: the AutoModel model backend (native V4 class / DSA-MLA), molt/trainer/fsdp/ (PP/EP/CP with tp_size=1, MTP-last-stage layout, optimizer offload), molt/trainer/vllm/ (engine build + DeepseekV4ForCausalLM recognition + CUDA matrix; Molt currently pins vllm==0.24.0 — recognition/CUDA matrix unknown to me), MoE routing stability, and the agent/chat-template path in molt/agents/
User problem
I want to run online RL on DeepSeek-V4 (V4-Flash first, V4-Pro later) with Molt, using its agentic Env/ChatAgent reward path. I'm coming to this with two pieces of directly relevant prior experience:
Given all that, my core ask is not just "does Molt plan to support V4 RL" - it's whether Molt can offer a more user-friendly, batteries-included recipe than what I had to assemble by hand on verl. Concretely, a V4 RL recipe that ships:
Desired outcome
A stated plan (and ideally a validated reference recipe) covering:
Affected area
area:llm
Extra context
Affected areas in Molt: the AutoModel model backend (native V4 class / DSA-MLA), molt/trainer/fsdp/ (PP/EP/CP with tp_size=1, MTP-last-stage layout, optimizer offload), molt/trainer/vllm/ (engine build + DeepseekV4ForCausalLM recognition + CUDA matrix; Molt currently pins vllm==0.24.0 — recognition/CUDA matrix unknown to me), MoE routing stability, and the agent/chat-template path in molt/agents/